Everywhere you turn an exhibit of real human bodies is about to open up in a shopping mall or a "science" museum. These exhibits, with names such as Body Worlds, Bodies: the Exposition, and Our Bodies, The Universe Within loudly boast that they consist of plasticized real human bodies. Amsterdam protest to unknown Chinese
In an attempt to defuse our inhibitions and overcome taboos about what may be done with the human body the exhibits claim that they are uniquely educational and that they will inspire people to be more concerned with their health. To questions about the source of the bodies, Body Worlds claims to have obtained permission; other exhibits point to "legal" sources in China(but read the scathing commentary by Eric Heyl.
So what's the problem? The problem is not the source of the bodies. Even if there was no doubt on this count, the exhibits are wrong, and nobody can give you permission to do something that is wrong.
Our natural inhibitions make us uncomfortable with the display of the bodies of the deceased ... It is not always possible or necessary to come up with a reason why something is wrong, but if I was to single out one reason, it would be that we show respect for the living by respecting the remains of the deceased. These exhibits cheapen the value of life . It is a short step to treating people as objects that in their turn are not particularly valuable.
The plasticized real bodies are very unreal, and deny the reality of death. Their public display is convenient for gawking but the purported benefits to science and education originate from Madison Avenue. Most importantly, although the exhibits try to have it both ways and claim to be art as well as science, human beings are not works of art.
Much has been written about these exhibits. An article by Pastor Christoph Reiners which resulted in the Abbotsford BC schools banning field trips influenced me deeply. Norman Lebrecht's article was pungent, and the Dutch philosopher Rob Van Gewen thoroughly discusses the case against as does Rabbi Danny Schiff. Be sure to read Elaine Catz's op-ed in the Pittsburgh Post Gazette. Elaine resigned from the Carnegie Science Center because of her outrage about the exhibit there. Listen to Linda Schulte-Sass explaining how the exhibit is marketed to American audiences.
If you review the links above, and the many comments and the many additional links on this site, you will find that some opponents invoke religion, and some do not. In fact, there are some things that we know are wrong instinctively, and the display of plasticized human bodies for the titillation of the public is one of them.
Aaron Ginsburg Sharon, Massachusetts, USA
